
How to Draw a Retirement Income

This
article is a recommended way for managing the effects of
reverse-dollar-cost-averaging.
Accessing
Income from Investment Portfolios
Most
people believe that income should be drawn from conservatively invested funds.
In some cases this may be appropriate. However, as Canadians start to retire
earlier and live longer, the resources they are going to use for income may need
to last 40 to 50 years. A fund too conservatively invested over 40 to 50 years
may not perform according to your needs and expectations.
If you invest in a fairly
aggressive strategy using a high component of equities, the day-to-day
fluctuations in the market will create volatile asset values.
For many years,
dollar
cost averaging has been used to move money into markets that are
volatile. The following chart illustrates the impact of this approach as
markets move up and down. This discipline fights against the natural tendency to
buy when the markets are high and sell when the markets are low.

If you now start removing
level income each month, you get the following results. This is counterproductive because
you end up taking out a greater percentage of your assets when values are reduced and
less when the values are improved.

Wait a minute
................... 
The final picture is what
you really want to accomplish, and that is to remove more value when the markets
are up and less value when the markets are down. A mechanism to accomplish this
could be referred to as “asset value averaging”. By using a constant percentage
of assets, the dollars removed from the investment fund when markets are up and
will be much larger than the amount removed when markets are down.

Solution: Sell a % of asset
value
This
asset value averaging approach sounds great theoretically, but most people don’t
like to live with a fluctuating income. A “reservoir fund” can be established to
receive these fluctuating income amounts and invest them on a more conservative
basis using money market or income funds. Then, a constant dollar amount can be
extracted from this much less volatile “reservoir” fund.

Depending on your risk
perspective, the percentage of assets chosen to move money from your ongoing
investment fund to the “reservoir fund” can be set at a reasonably high level or
at a lower level closer to the target income that you intend to take out and
spend. If a high percentage of assets are used, the reservoir fund will build up
much quicker and provide a stronger buffer against market changes over
short-term cycles.
For convenience, you may want to transfer a percentage of the assets
at the end of each year and then draw constant income on an electronic transfer
basis from your reservoir fund.
If
you moved a fixed percentage of the fund into a transitional fund, then paid out
a pre-set amount of income, you
would in effect, be reducing the effects of reverse-dollar-cost-averaging. It
does require some manual effort to determine that amount each payment period and
transition the money.
Alternatively, using
profile or folio funds tends to have a natural built-in buffer since the mix is
constantly being rebalanced. As one portion of the portfolio grows faster than
the others, the rebalancing has the effect of selling off what is relatively
higher and buying what is relatively lower. This constant rebalancing tends to
reduce the volatility inherent in most static portfolios.
Theoretically this
provides a more stable asset base from which to draw an income.
Summary: